Without further ado, I present the official IvyHoopsOnline preseason predictions for the 2011-2012 season.
Without further ado, I present the official IvyHoopsOnline preseason predictions for the 2011-2012 season.
If you took everything said in the preseason media teleconference at face value, then you’d think every team has a shot to win the Ivy League title this year. Here are a few of the best sound bites from Wednesday, taken beyond face value.
Yale head coach James Jones on the Bulldogs’ preseason No. 2 ranking: “Every year for the last I don’t know how many, we’ve always been picked lower than we’ve finished. We’re picked second; there’s only one more spot to go to, so hopefully it works out for us.”
In the middle of a vanilla interview, Jones whips out this nugget. That’s a suspiciously juicy factoid for a coach—I’m guessing the SID gave it to him. For the record, the last time Yale failed to surpass its preseason ranking was 2007-08. By the way, looking through old preseason rankings is a hoot: last year Cornell got a first place vote; in 2009-10, Penn was picked third; the 2008-09 Tigers were chosen dead last. I wonder if the previous season is a better predictor of preseason polls than the end of year rankings.
Princeton head coach Mitch Henderson on the Tigers’ scheduling difficulties: “When you’re in a position like ours—we like being in a situation like this—where teams don’t want to play you, especially this year with a good group coming back, it’s a little more difficult to get your phone calls returned.”
Humblebrag! “They hate me cuz they ain’t me,” Henderson added.
Paul Franklin, The Trenton Times: “It hasn’t been that long, obviously, since you played…or maybe it is. [Pause for laughter]. Sorry about that.”
Penn head coach Jerome Allen: “It’s OK.”
Paul Franklin of The Trenton Times stole the show on Wednesday. Reporter chumminess is an especially awkward variety of male flirting, but in the hands of a skilled veteran like Mr. Franklin, it’s borderline magical.
“1995 was like so long ago, AMIRITE?! ROFL!!!”
Jerome was unfazed, and in his chocolatey, midnight DJ voice he gave a courtesy chuckle and forgave the age crack.
Harvard head coach Tommy Amaker on 2009-10: “Jeremy made so many other people better. I think that’s always the mark of a special player, which Jeremy was for us.”
The Jeremy Lin narrative has taken a slightly disappointing turn, as he’s become one of those NBA bench players that fans cheer for ironically. Well Tommy Amaker is not going to let that spoil his legacy in Cambridge: JEREMY LIN IS THE BEST PLAYER IN HARVARD HISTORY. THAT’S THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS.
Dartmouth head coach Paul Cormier on the Big Green’s inexperience: “One good thing about having freshmen is sometimes that lack of experience doesn’t affect their confidence and they just feel that they’ve been successful at whatever level they’ve been at and hopefully that some of that success can carry over.”
What Cormier is trying to say is that freshmen don’t have the Dartmouth stink yet. The Dartmouth stink doesn’t wash off. One season in Hanover and you’re permanently stinky. It sounds like his plan is to quarantine every member of last season’s 5-23 team by keeping them on bench rest and to start anew with this freshmen class. It’s like the plot of The Walking Dead.
Paul Franklin, Trenton Times: “Playing a little devil’s advocate with you here: if I’m a hardcore Cornell fan and I start harassing you with, ‘Hey coach, when are we going back to the Sweet Sixteen?’, what’s your response?”
Cornell head coach Bill Courtney: [Laughs] “I’ll tell you what, it’s funny because you get a lot of that when I go to the grocery store or the movies or something like that… We’re working towards that and we’ll continue to work until we get back to that point.”
Franklin: “Alright, you’ve got five years then I’m coming after you.”
Courtney: [Laughs] “I hear you.”
More gold from Franklin. The question is legitimate—when will the Big Red climb back to the top of the Ivy League?—but I wonder what he means by “coming after you.” I can only assume that Mr. Franklin has some ferocious tickling in store for Courtney if he can’t lead the Big Red back to March Madness by 2016.
Columbia head coach Kyle Smith, on senior guard Noruwa Agho: “I just feel he’s one of the best all-around players in the league and one of the best all-around players I’ve ever been around… I don’t know if that will show up as much in the stats, but it’s certainly showing up with his leadership.”
The Myth of Noruwa Agho lives on, but Smith at least seems to acknowledge that Agho’s raw stats hide his inefficiency. Thankfully for Columbia, Agho might lead the league in leadership, so they’ve got that going for them, which is nice.
Brown head coach Jesse Agel: “This league is really, really good. There are no nights off. There are no more weekends where, you know, Penn and Princeton would go somewhere and say, ‘Well, we’ve just got to get through this weekend and we should win two.’ I don’t think anyone’s thinking that anywhere now.”
Franklin: “No more sightseeing, huh?”
Agel: [Laughs] “I don’t know what you could see on some of those rides. Having lived up in the deep Northeast, not much sightseeing in the winter.”
Franklin: [Laughs] “Alright, thanks.”
Franklin does it again! It might be the preseason, but Mr. Franklin is in rare form. He forced a chuckle out of Jesse Agel, who might be the most humorless coach in the Ivies. But Agel snaps back into his sour mien with a terse “sure” to close out a riveting, if hardly informative, hour and a half teleconference.
Adam Wire (3.8 ppg, 5 reb, 1.8 ast, 1.3 stl), Mark Coury (5.3 ppg, 3.8 reb) and Aaron Osgood (6.9 ppg, 4.3 reb)
Statistically speaking, Wire, Coury and Osgood aren’t huge losses for the Red. Realistically speaking, the trio of departed seniors leaves a gaping hole in the paint. Wire, Osgood and Coury were the only true post players of note on last years squad and with the three gone, the Red will be forced to rely on younger, thinner, less experienced players in the frontcourt.
Galal Cancer (Guard), Devin Cherry (Guard), Nenad Tomic (Forward), Dave LaMore (Forward/Center), Shonn Miller (Forward), Deion Giddens (Forward/Center), Dominick Scelfo (Guard – Sophomore, missed entire Freshman year due to injury)
To replace the departed seniors in the lane, the Red has added four potential impact frontcourt players. Reports from Cornell’s annual Red-White scrimmage indicated that Tomic was the most impressive of the new bigs. LaMore and Miller missed the game with injuries and Giddens is seen as a raw prospect who is still developing. LaMore is expected back within a matter of weeks and Miller is expected back by the end of November.
To an already deep backcourt rotation, the Red adds Cancer, Cherry and Scelfo. The trio will allow Wroblewski to play off the ball more frequently this year. Cancer does everything on the court – he had seven rebounds and five assists in the Red-White scrimmage
– while Cherry appears to be more of a scorer. Scelfo was expected to see the court last year as a freshman before it became apparent that he would miss the entire year. Expect him to break into the rotation this year as well.
Overall, the seven newcomers will be expected to produce. The class is talented and, if healthy, should provide immediate help to a team on the rise.
November 11th – @ St. Bonaventure – In the season opener, the Red will face Andrew Nicholson, a legitimate NBA prospect in the paint. At 6’ 9”, he gave Cornell fits last year with his inside-outside game putting up 19 points and 10 rebounds. Demitrius Conger also returns at the small forward position for the Bonnies, one year removed from a 22-point, 14-rebound performance at Newman Arena. Backcourt play kept the Red in the game last year and this one should be a sign of things to come. If the frontcourt can slow down St. Bonaventure enough inside, the Red have a chance both on opening night and in the Ivy League conversation. Nicholson and Conger may be as tough of a frontcourt pair as the Red see outside of Harvard – yes, the Crimson are that good upfront.
December 19th – @ Illinois – Replacing the annual Syracuse game on the slate is a pair of Big Ten games (also @ Penn St. on December 22nd). Last year a young Cornell team put a scare into Minnesota – then ranked 13th in the country. If the Red can break through and get a win over a major conference team in the non-conference it could be a big confidence booster as the season progresses.
January 3rd – @ Maryland – Same goes for this one.
January 13th – vs. Princeton – The Tigers should be a top-half team if they find a way to fill the huge hole that is left by the departure of Kareem Maddox. It’s the Ivy opener for Cornell and should be an indicator of how the Red match up with Ancient Eight squads lacking a dominant big man (everyone other than Harvard and Yale).
January 21st – @ Columbia – The Red was swept by it’s travel partner last year and looks to get back on track versus the Lions in the first of their two matchups of the year.
February 3rd – @ Harvard – Can Cornell compete with the elite? On paper, Harvard shouldn’t lose a league game this tapscott year. On hardwood it’s never quite that simple. Keith Wright and Co. should be the season’s biggest test for a young and thin frontcourt.
A Look at the Roster
With the backcourt rotation including as many as nine different players, expect to see three or four guards on the floor at times. Anchoring the crew will be seniors Chris Wroblewski and Drew Ferry. Both will likely predominantly play off the ball – which will be somewhat new to Wroblewski – as Jake Matthews, Miles Asafo-Adjei, Galal Cancer and Dominick Scelfo should all wow gold kaufen billig see some time at the point.
Senior Max Groebe is working on a pulled hamstring. Injuries have hampered Groebe throughout his career online casino nederlandsegokken in Ithaca and if he is finally healthy he has the potential to score 20 points any time he steps on the floor.
Former manager, Jonathan Gray will likely round out the guard rotation. He can play any position one through three and was perhaps the biggest surprise of last year. Expect him to continue to be the utility man for Cornell.
Overall, Wroblewski-Ferry and Co. should challenge Curry-McNally in Cambridge and Rosen-Cartwright in Philadelphia for the title of top backcourt in the Ancient Eight. The guard play is clearly the strength for the Red and will carry the team throughout the year.
Guards will likely play substantial minutes on the wing, but expect to see Anthony Gatlin (when healthy) and Manny Sahota find a few minutes at the three. Peter McMillan could play in spots too (see Minnesota last year for evidence that he can provide a big boost in a pinch). If Errick Peck and Dwight Tarwater are on the floor together, one of them will likely play on the wing as well. Gatlin came on strong down the stretch last season and could push for increased playing time as a senior, but the perpetually-injured Texas native has been sidelined since knee surgery in September. His return may take some time.
At the 4, Errick Peck will likely see most of the minutes – he was moved to the power forward position in the second half of last season – with Tarwater and Tomic also seeing time. Tarwater is slightly undersized but provides explosiveness and perimeter play that Tomic lacks. Tomic gives more size and rebounding in the post. When healthy, Peck has the ability (as shown in league play last year) to be an all-Ivy pick but right now the timetable for his return is unclear. He’s still recovering from minor knee surgery in July and is not yet back at 100%. Peck did not see action in the Red-White scrimmage.
Tarwater missed most of his freshman season with mono and could be a huge addition to the undersized Red – especially if Peck is not ready for opening night. Courtney and his staff are reportedly excited about his improvement and are very high on Tarwater this year.
Freshman Shonn Miller may have to wait to carve out time in the rotation. Currently hampered with a stress fracture, Miller’s return won’t come any time soon. When he does return, Miller’s size at 6’ 7” could be an asset to the Red.
In the post, Josh Figini and Eitan Chemerinski will be looked to for production on both ends of the court. With the trio of Coury, Osgood and Wire departing, the sophomore and junior will be asked to take on expanded roles. Reports indicate that both have put on weight and have improved over the summer, although the Red failed to finish inside effectively in their pre-season scrimmage.
Adding depth in the middle will be freshman Dave LaMore. LaMore is expected to return from an ankle sprain in the coming days, and at close to 230 pounds, LaMore has the ability to provide some girth against bigger posts.
Expect the rotation to go as deep as 13 or 14 on opening night, and potentially 15 or 16 if players return quickly from injuries. The combination of having too many bodies in the backcourt and not enough in the frontcourt may leave everybody with fewer minutes than expected. Early on Courtney may struggle with the rotation (as was the case last year), but expect him to find the answer more quickly than in his opening campaign. Energy will likely trump skill for the opening tip and the starting five once again may not be the top five for the Red.
Because of Courtney’s unorthodox lineups from last season, a starting five won’t be much of an indicator of the overall rotation (although for the record I expect Cancer, Ski, Asafo-Adjei, Peck – if healthy – and Figini to take the floor for the tip on opening night). That being said, here’s a projected minute breakdown:
Guys Playing Projected Starter’s Minutes (25 min): Wroblewski, Ferry, Peck
Major minutes in Major Spots (15-25 min): Figini/Chemerinski, Tarwater, Cancer
Sure to Find Key Minutes (7-15 min): Groebe, Gray, Matthews/Asafo-Adjei/Scelfo
Could Work into the Mix (2-7 min): LaMore, Gatlin, Cherry, Tomic, Sahota, McMillan
How They’ll Finish
Ceiling: Cornell finds the right chemistry early, gets Peck, Groebe and the rest of the infirmary back from injury on the early side and between Chemerinski and Figini find an offensive touch in the paint that they didn’t get from the bigs last year. On the defensive end they do enough to limit the opposition on the low block. Overall, this is a run and gun team and they simply outscore people.
A deep rotation keeps legs fresh against more athletic major conference teams (they manage to knock off Illinois, Penn St. or Maryland in addition to a couple of decent mid-majors) and allows the Red to run most league teams off the floor on grueling Ivy weekends. They manage a 10-win Ancient Eight slate, garnering second place behind only an undefeated Crimson squad. Overall, the Red win 20-games and set themselves up for a shot at knocking off Harvard the following year with a solid recruiting class.
Floor: The Red struggle to gel after an inconsistent pre-season due to a string of injuries. With a larger roster than last year, the coaching staff takes even longer to come to a consensus on a rotation. Cornell looks like the Penn teams under Glenn Miller, losing disenchanted players who were promised playing time that they never see, and lose games by large margins along the way. They strike out against all decent opponents in the non-conference season and can’t seem to get it going in league play either.
Somehow, the Red fall at Dartmouth and get swept by Columbia for the second straight year. They steal a win each from Penn, Dartmouth and Brown (all at home) and fall to 7th place in the Ivy League. Overall they win just 7 games, including one against Division-III Albright College. Meanwhile they cement a spot in the Ivy cellar for the coming year, losing recruits who see the quickly self-destructing Red as a “bad fit.”
Projection: The Red manage a close miss at Penn St. in the preseason after getting revenge against Binghamton, BU and Lehigh at home. Taking the momentum of improvement into league play, the Red start quickly by knocking off Princeton and Penn at home. Cornell sweeps Dartmouth and Brown but also gets swept by Harvard. Overall they finish 4th in the league at 8-6 (14-14 overall) behind the undefeated Crimson, 10-4 Yale and a surprise Columbia team that finds a top-half finish. Penn and Princeton find their way back into the Ivy basement finishing above Brown and Dartmouth to round out the league.
Ed Note: Our Cornell and Harvard writers participated in a debate over how a one-game playoff between the 2009-10 Cornell squad and the 2011-12 Harvard team would play out. This was a hypothetical game pitting the teams against each other. The debate was not meant to compare what each team has accomplished because Harvard, despite the lofty expectations, has done nothing yet this year. The point of this exercise was to compare how these teams would match up with one another and perhaps determine a ceiling for this heralded Crimson bunch if their unprecedented Ivy recruiting class lives up to the hype. With that out of the way, Sam Aleinikoff (SA) represented Cornell and C. River Banks (CRB) wrote in support of Harvard.
A year removed from a gut-wrenching finish to Ivy play for the Crimson, we’re putting Harvard back in another one-game playoff at Ivy Hoops Online, fictionally pitting this year’s Crimson against the 2009-2010 squad from Cornell. Let’s start by taking a look at the rosters before we get the debate going.
Cornell Big Red
G – Louis Dale – 5-11, 180 lbs – Senior
Accolades: Three-time First Team All-Ivy, 2008 Ivy League POY, 2008-2009 AP All-American Honorable Mention, 2010 Mid-Major MVP (awarded by collegeinsider.com)
Stats: (2009-2010) 12.8 ppg, 4.7 ast, 2.9 reb, 1.4 stl, 39% 3pt, 85% FT
Currently: Playing his second pro-season in Germany. Nicknamed “The Solution” by ESPN during the 2010 NCAA Tournament, Dale is terrorizing the likes of “The Answer” (Allen Iverson) overseas.
Hit List Includes: Outplaying John Wall in the Sweet Sixteen to the tune of 17 pts, 4 reb and 2 ast; torching Trevon Hughes and Jordan Taylor of Wisconsin for 26 pts, 3 reb and 3 ast; dominating Juan Fernandez and Temple with 21 pts and 7 ast.
G – Chris Wroblewski – Sophomore
Accolades: 2008-2009 Ivy League ROY, 2009-2010 All-Ivy Honorable Mention, 2010-2011 Second Team All-Ivy
Stats: (2009-2010) 9 ppg, 3.2 ast, 2.7 reb, 46% 3PT, 87% FT
Currently: Trying to help the Red recapture the glory during his senior year at Cornell.
Worth Noting: Ski was named Third-Team Academic All-America and was honored as one of the top 15 student-athletes in college basketball.
F – Ryan Wittman – 6-7, 215 lbs. – Senior
Accolades: 2006-2007 Ivy ROY, Three-time unanimous first team All-Ivy, Unanimous 2009-2010 Ivy POY, 2009-2010 AP All-American Honorable Mention
Stats: (2009-2010) 17.5 ppg, 4 reb, 1.8 ast, 43% 3PT, 83% FT
Currently: After a year bouncing between Italy and the NBA D-League, Wittman is currently unsigned for the 2011-2012 season.
Ryan Wittman “Facts”: The UN Security Council has determined that Ryan Wittman’s jump shot is a Weapon of Mass Destruction. Poor shooters can’t hit the broad side of a barn; Ryan Wittman hits all sides with a single shot (Courtesy of ryanwittmanfacts.com).
F – Jon Jaques – 6-7, 220 lbs. – Senior
Accolades: Tri-captain with fellow senior Jeff Foote and Alex Tyler, burst onto the scene as a Senior after seeing limited time over the first 3 years
Stats: 8 ppg, 3.4 reb, 1.2 stl, 1 ast, 48% 3 PT
Currently: A year of pro-ball in Israel was enough on the other side of the pond for Jaques who will now turn to coaching and join the staff at Stevens Tech in New Jersey.
Clutch Moments: The first meaningful minutes of his career came when he stepped onto the floor to sink game-icing free-throws vs. Drexel. Just a few games later, scored 20 pts to lead Cornell over St. John’s in MSG.
C – Jeff Foote – 7-0, 265 lbs. – Senior
Accolades: 2-time Ivy Defensive Player of the Year, 2009-2010 First Team All-Ivy, two-time second team All-Ivy
Stats: 12.4 ppg, 8.1 reb, 2.3 ast, 1.9 blk, 63% FG
Currently: Unsigned after playing his first professional year in Israel and Spain.
Poster Collection Includes: Kyle Singler (Duke – 2010 NBA Draft), Jon Leuer (Wisconsin), Arinze Onuaku (Syracuse), Wes Johnson (Syracuse – Lottery Pick), JaMychal Green (Alabama).
Head Coach – Steve Donahue – 10th Year with Cornell
Bio: Donahue won the Ivy title in each of his final three years with the Red. After a run to the Sweet Sixteen to close the 2009-2010 season Donahue jumped to the ACC, accepting the job at Boston College.
In the rotation: Alex Tyler (captain, 2 year starter), Geoff Reeves (2 year starter, lock-down defender), Max Groebe (UMass transfer, deadly shooter), Adam Wire (inch-for-inch likely the top defender on a team that included the Ivy League Defensive POY), Mark Coury (starter at Kentucky, relegated to the bench at Cornell, known for his toughness and defense), Errick Peck (Freshman Phenom)
The Case for the Red
The glass slipper never quite fit for the Red during the 2009-2010 season because Cornell was no Cinderella. Legitimately one of the top 25 teams in the country, the Red were thrown onto the national scene after a near-miss at top-ranked Kansas. The non-conference slate included wins over St. John’s, Alabama, UMass, St. Joe’s and La Salle. The conference schedule was a 13 game victory lap (with a 1-game hiccup) that made the rest of the league look like a group of high school teams. Highlights included a 36-point blowout of a 21-win Harvard team, a 14-point average margin of victory in league play and carrying the league back to national prominence with the Ancient Eight’s first Sweet Sixteen appearance in 30 years.
Harvard has an uber-athletic, highly-experienced squad returning this year, but the depth, talent, cohesion and intangibles just don’t match up. Anything short of a trip to the second round of the NCAA Tournament should be a disappointment for the Crimson this year, but in a one-game playoff there’s no question that 2009-2010 Cornell comes away victorious. Let’s just remember how clutch Harvard is in one-game playoffs…
G – Oliver McNally – 6-3, 180 lbs. – Senior
Accolades: Two-year co-captain
Stats: 10.1 ppg, 3.3 rebs, 3.1 ast, 49.1% FG, 44.2% 3PT, 92.6% FT
Worth Noting: Playing in the shadow of somewhat flashier company, McNally is the heart and soul of the Crimson, often supplying the biggest buckets in the biggest moments, like his game-winning runner at the Palestra last season or his last second free throw to force overtime at Yale in 2010.
G – Brandyn Curry – 6-1, 195 lbs. – Junior
Accolades: 2010-11 Second Team All-Ivy, 2010-11 Academic All-Ivy
Stats: 9.3 ppg, 5.9 ast, 3.8 rebs, 2.3 A-T ratio, 73.3% FT, 42.3% FG
Worth Noting: A crafty lefty and a sizzling ball-handler, Curry is the Crimson’s quarterback on offense and a lockdown perimeter defender.
F – Christian Webster – 6-5, 205 lbs. – Junior
Accolades: 2010-11 Honorable Mention All-Ivy
Stats: 13.0 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.5 ast, 89.4% FT, 43.5% FG, 39.9% 3PT
Worth Noting: Webster is a slasher from the wing, who is often tasked with jumpstarting the Crimson offense by attacking the rim and getting to the free throw line.
F – Kyle Casey – 6-7, 225 lbs. – Junior
Accolades: 2009-10 Ivy League ROY, 2010-11 Second Team All-Ivy, 2009-10 Honorable Mention All-Ivy
Stats: 10.7 ppg, 6.0 rebs, 1.1 blks, 50.5% FG, 78.6% FT
Worth Noting: An athletic scorer, Casey improved on a stalwart freshman campaign despite being hampered by a broken foot for much of last season.
C – Keith Wright – 6-8, 240 lbs. – Senior
Accolades: Two-time co-captain, 2010-11 Ivy League POY, 2010-11 Unanimous First Team All-Ivy, 2010-11 AP All-America Honorable Mention
Stats: 14.8 ppg, 8.3 rebs, 1.8 blk, 1.5 ast, 58.4% FG, 70.4% FT
Worth Noting: Wright made the leap last season from good big man to veritable paint monster; a willing passer and skilled finisher, he was a nightmare matchup for each opponent and the foundation of Harvard’s historically efficient offense.
Head Coach – Tommy Amaker – Fifth Year with Harvard
Bio: After stints at Seton Hall and Michigan, Amaker arrived in Cambridge, and, ever since, he has piloted Harvard’s meteoric rise to the top of the Ivy League standings. He is one of the most in-demand coaches for top college basketball programs.
In the rotation (projected): Laurent Rivard (standout sharp-shooter, looking to build on a superb rookie campaign), Wesley Saunders (much-heralded freshman who will try to crack the rotation), Kenyatta Smith (see Saunders), Steve Moundou-Missi (see Smith), Jonah Travis (see Moundou-Missi), Ugo Okam (giant center with developing skills and five-fouls to give), Matt Brown (energy guy and defensive specialist), Andrew Van Nest (serviceable big man who likes to launch the three), Jeff Georgatos (steady frontcourt presence who can hold it down in the post)
The Case for the Crimson
There is a growing trend among sportswriters to christen champions in the preseason. Considering the fates of the Miami Heat, the Boston Red Sox, and the Philadelphia Eagles, I don’t want to join that chorus and anoint the 2011-12 Harvard basketball team the successors to the 2009-10 Big Red. But for the sake of discussion (and out of enthusiasm for the upcoming season), I’m willing to consider a hypothetical one-game playoff between the two teams.
Can Harvard win? Yes. I don’t have the luxury of pointing to a list of accomplishments because, well, they haven’t accomplished anything as of yet. But Curry-McNally-Webster-Casey-Wright match up with Dale-Reeves-Jaques-Wittman-Foote at least as well as the Penn team that authored the lone blemish on Cornell’s league record and the Princeton squad that took the Big Red down to the wire twice. I’ll grant that those midseason games lack the urgency of a one-game playoff, and Cornell would likely be at its best in this imaginary playoff against Harvard. But I still think the Crimson has a decent shot. Here’s how I see it going down:
Foote is the Big Red’s big advantage (literally). His size was almost impossible to counter, especially with the Ivies’ lack of size on the bench. However, this Harvard team is unique in its ability to make Foote earn his points. It has at least eight different players that it can put on the big man—that’s forty fouls on a sub-60 percent free-throw shooter. On the other end, the Crimson has the offensive talent to challenge Foote in the paint and perhaps put him in foul trouble. In the backcourt, McNally and Curry are arguably the equals to Dale and Reeves (if that seems outlandish, please just wait to see the kind of year Curry has). That leaves Wittman and Casey. I know Wittman is a demigod in Ithaca, but, despite whatever memes you’ve created for him, he still missed 57.4 percent of his threes. I think a healthy Casey can bring as much to the table as the Big Red POY, though I guess this season will be the true test for that statement.
Of course, a Crimson victory is predicated on a lot of breaks falling its way, but none of them seem too farfetched, no? How do you see The Game playing out tactically and strategically?
One more question: Without trying to sound controversial, I personally think the Big Red dynasty has been overly mythologized. Of course, they won all of those games, advanced to the Sweet Sixteen, and they deserve every bit of the credit that has come their way. But other unheralded mid-majors have advanced beyond the first weekend—Richmond and VCU last year, St. Mary’s and Northern Iowa in 2010, Davidson and Western Kentucky in 2008, etc.—all of which were stellar teams, but these squads can easily be thought to have “outperformed” their expected result. Yet, for some reason, Ivy fans have taken it for granted that Cornell was exactly as good as its No. 17 ranking. Does even a little part of you think maybe the Big Red was fortunate to beat Temple and Wisconsin (despite the one-sidedness of those contests)? Are these just the sour grapes of a Harvard fan who still hasn’t gotten over that 36-point shit-kicking?
First of all, let’s take a look at that final point…”fortunate”?
Quite honestly, Temple and Wisconsin were both fortunate that the score didn’t truly represent how one sided those match-ups were. The shellackings that the 2009-2010 Red put on their NCAA tournament foes in the first two rounds were far from fortunate.
A comparison to 2010 Richmond (13-3 in the Atlantic 10, regular season wins over Purdue, Arizona State, Seton Hall and Wake Forest) is welcomed. Richmond looked like a Sweet Sixteen team and was a Sweet Sixteen team.
I’ll take the Northern Iowa comparison too. A team that lost just five games all year, was under-seeded because of the conference it plays in, had a seven foot center who gave BCS big men fits, knocked down shots from every part of the floor and played Kansas tight – sound familiar? Oh yeah. Cornell and Northern Iowa from 2009-2010 were comparable teams, were legit top-25 teams and would both beat 2011-2012 Harvard nine times out of ten.
Davidson 2008 – close calls against top-10 teams in the non-conference, dominate in their league, show their true colors against the big conferences in the Tournament. Davidson was also deserving of it’s spot in the final rankings.
VCU went from a slightly above average CAA team to a Final Four participant. Yes, agreed, they outperformed in March (April finally brought them back down). Cornell was no VCU. There is no Final Four banner in the rafters of Newman Arena, but there were also no 11-loss regular season and no consistent slip ups against the likes of Georgia State, James Madison or Drexel. There should be no questions that Cornell 2009-2010 is no VCU.
Cornell was also no St. Mary’s. See the match-ups against a one-year-away Richmond team and an imploding Villanova squad if you want to understand what it means to be fortunate in March.
Western Kentucky? They needed OT to beat Drake and then got 13-seeded San Diego in Round 2. Again, see Western Kentucky’s 2008 NCAA Tournament for an example of fortune.
Cornell was not fortunate. March of 2009 was merely a continuation of what they had done since November.
Let’s digress from the Cornell – (insert successful mid-major team here) comparisons. The real debate is Cornell vs. Harvard.
In the frontcourt: Hack-a-Foote still gives the 7-footer a chance at the line and even a 60% FT shooter makes a majority of his shots. Also – suggesting Van Nest or Okam in the post against Foote? Please, please, Tommy Amaker, make that mistake again. On the defensive end, Donahue’s constant substitutions between Foote, Coury, Tyler and Wire – not to mention his man, 1-3-1, 2-3, 3-2 and match-up zones – and Wright and Casey would get nothing in the paint. Wright finds foul trouble much to quickly against lesser, smaller foes. Foote, with 4 inches and 25 pounds on him would be virtually unstoppable. Casey is a nice piece but he has neither the strength to match Coury or Tyler in the post, nor the perimeter play to match Jaques. Forget Wittman, Casey wouldn’t be tabbed with that responsibility.
On the wing: Webster on Wittman might be the best matchup Harvard would get. Webster’s length and athleticism could frustrate Wittman on the perimeter, but Webster is a glorified slasher and an overrated defender. Wittman would get his in transition or off a quick release from the Red’s ball movement. Best case for Harvard: Wittman puts up 15 points on 15 shots and Webster manages to get a few buckets in transition to make up for his lack of legitimate half court production against such a long, smart, athletically-underrated team.
In the backcourt: McNally on Wroblewski could be a toss up. McNally has more size. Ski has the passing ability. Both have stability, consistency. The only difference is that McNally is asked to take on a bigger role with his teammates around him faltering. Against Cornell’s best on ball defender he can’t get much.
Dale vs. Curry is almost a joke. Curry may have the quickness but in every other facet of the game Dale has the edge – shooting, off the dribble, on the boards, generally leading a team…the list goes on. If he puts up 17 on John Wall and 20 on the combination of Jeremy Lin, Curry (as a freshman) and anyone else the Crimson had in the backcourt, please, please bring on Curry on his own. Turn the TV on because Dale is about to go off.
On the bench: Talent, experience and cohesion (Red) vs. unproven, yet highly touted, underclassmen (Harvard). Good luck Harvard.
A neutral site keeps this game within 20 and interesting until midway through the second half. That’s when Wright is sitting with 4 fouls apiece, Van Nest and Okam have been thrashed for a few too many and the freshman are tabbed with fighting the top true center the mid-majors have seen since Andrew Bogut.
Yes, Harvard is talented and could steal one out of 10 from Cornell – that was better than Penn’s chances and they pulled it off in the Palestra – so maybe, just maybe, in Lavietes the Crimson could too. The Princeton comparison is ridiculous. A slow-it-down team that relies on steady coaching is a far cry from Harvard’s up and down style.
Keith Wright and Harvard look like a poor man’s Levoy Allen and Temple who the good-not-lucky Red beat handily in March. Cornell wins going away, 78-63.
I only brought up the possibility that 2009-10 Cornell is remembered too fondly in the context of this playoff, not in order to besmirch the best Ivy team of this decade. But since I’m the lone wolf crying in the wilderness on this point, I guess we’ll drop the argument.
In the frontcourt: I witnessed Foote’s abuse of Van Nest in 2010—it wasn’t pretty. So believe me, I don’t have any delusions of Van Nest, Okam, or any of the freshmen somehow stopping “the top true center the mid-majors have seen since Andrew Bogut.” They are perfectly capable of fouling Foote though, and the visual of the 7-footer standing on the free-throw line does not inspire much fear in the heart of this Harvard fan. If the Crimson loses by Foote hitting his freebies, so be it. Also, I think you might be underrating Casey’s impact. Sure, you can say he doesn’t have Tyler’s strength or Jaques’ “perimeter play,” but I’d argue that Tyler doesn’t have Casey’s “perimeter play” and Jaques doesn’t have the big man’s strength. What’s to prevent Casey from exposing their weaknesses as opposed to the other way around? Lastly, to clarify, I didn’t mean to suggest that Wittman and Casey would be matched up in my initial Wittman/Casey comparison; I meant to contrast only their production.
On the wing: I’m glad you afford Webster as much respect as you do. He’s the least flashy of Harvard’s contributors and sometimes overlooked, but without Webster’s wing play, the Crimson’s inside-out offense becomes one dimensional. I’ve never considered Webster a great defender, and Wittman is so tall with such a quick release that I don’t see him being all that effective stopping the shooter. I’d hope for the kind of 15-point off night from Wittman that you’re describing.
In the backcourt: As pleased as I am over your feelings on Webster, I’m just as disappointed in your assessment of Curry. The kid can play. He’s not as essential to Harvard as Wright, but I think you could argue that he was the Crimson’s best player throughout league play last year. Your flippant dismissal of him as a “joke” really only conveys to me that you haven’t seen him play enough. A junior, his story is only half written at this point, but I would not at all be surprised if, when all is said and done, his mantel has some of the same hardware as Dale’s. I would absolutely turn on my TV and get my popcorn ready for the Dale-Curry matchup. I don’t think it would be nearly as one-sided as you imagine.
On the bench: I’ll concede any and all points in this area because, at this stage, the Harvard freshmen are a relative unknown.
Coaching: Amaker knows how to run a program, but, fairly or unfairly, his Xs-and-Os have always been called into question. Donahue’s bona fides are stronger, and he is more familiar with the 2009-10 team than Amaker is with his 2011-12 squad. Coach D probably has the edge in a game situation.
I’m surprised that you think Cornell would win nine of out ten times. If you wanted a number from me, I would have said two out of three and a mean outcome of Cornell 75, Harvard 71 (I hope commenters won’t hesitate to post their predictions below). That’s no slight to the Big Red, I just think this Harvard team can be that good. If the Crimson manages to live up to the expectations for this season, it would be interesting to revisit this argument again in the spring.
Curry is no joke. Watching him twice in person last year, I thought as a sophomore he was the most impressive member of a highly-talented Harvard squad. It is the Dale-Curry match-up that I think would be a joke. My memory of Dale may be tainted because his final three games in a Cornell uniform were likely the best three games of his career, but if Dale were to play in his NCAA Tournament form (which I’ll mention once again was good enough to outplay John Wall, Trevon Hughes and Juan Fernandez), then I think this is no contest.
Nonetheless, you bring up a good point. This analysis completely depends on the time of year that we’re talking about. Cornell in November 2009 was very different from Cornell in March 2010. I’m sure the same will be true for this year’s Harvard team. Cornell in March vs. Harvard in November is a no-brainer for me. Cornell in March vs. Harvard in March could be a very different story.
If the young bench develops and Wright, Casey and Co. continue to improve, I could easily see Harvard raising a Sweet Sixteen banner of their own in Cambridge. If the team is virtually the same as the one we saw last year, I see a quick exit from the tournament. Regardless, the fact that Harvard has the talent and experience to even warrant this discussion says something about the Crimson’s outlook for the year.
The one thing that struck me watching Harvard last year is that they looked like a BCS conference team minus a couple inches. Keith Wright at 6-10, Kyle Casey at 6-9, Christian Webster at 6-7, Oliver McNally at 6-5 and Brandyn Curry at 6-2 – that’s a scary starting five in any conference in America. The athleticism and talent is there at every position to compete with just about anyone in the country. They can score in bunches, defend and force turnovers, get up and down the floor like a major conference school. With a couple added inches this team would be a top-25 team all year.
The Cornell 2009 – Harvard 2011 should be an interesting argument in the Spring once we have a better sense of this year’s group in Cambridge. Who knows, maybe I’ll be eating my words if Harvard manages to run the table in the Ivy League and make a little noise in the nonconference.
Either way, basketball season is upon us. Midnight Madness publicly kicked off the season for Harvard earlier this weekend and Cornell faithful will get their first glimpse of their team in less than a week at the annual Red-White scrimmage. Regardless of who you root for, with the hardwood squeaking once again and slates wiped completely clean, its tough to complain this time of year.
Absolutely. This frivolous comparison is just one of the many subplots in what should be a fascinating season. I wish you the worst of luck, my friend.
Rivals.com (Yahoo Sports) ranked the Ivy League 20th in their countdown of college basketball”s 32 conferences. The first half of the article consists of the usual praise for Cornell and Princeton”s recent postseason performance. The author, David Fox, seems to suggest that Harvard, this year”s prohibitive favorite, may have a different competitor to deal with at the top of the standings with Princeton losing Maddox and Mavraides. He cites Penn and Yale as the two squads with which the Crimson may have to contend, while suggesting Brown may make a leap from the bottom behind the youth movement led by McGonagill and Rafael Maia.
The rankings below the article though, at times, seem to be disconnected from the analysis. Princeton is left in the #2 spot, ahead of Penn and Yale even though Fox claimed Harvard would have different competition for the title. Additionally, Ian Hummer is given a spot on the league”s second team. If Hummer carries the Tigers to a second place finish this year after losing Maddox and Mavraides, I have to like his chances to make the first team.
The projected standings also show Brown staying put in the #7 slot despite the aforementioned praise and the prediction that Maia will be the league”s Rookie of the Year. While there are certainly minutes for Maia in the Bears” frontcourt that other freshmen may not see, a ROY season combined with last year”s ROY in the backcourt in McGonagill as well as All-Ivy Honorable Mention Tucker Halpern on the wing, who shot 40% from distance last year, and it seems like the Bears should be able to finish higher than 7th.
Other choices that deserve further examination include “Best frontcourt: Harvard,” which could also have been awarded to the Yale Bulldogs with the duo of Mangano and Kreisberg (with freshmen Sherrod and Childs-Klein coming off the bench). Best backcourt was given to Penn, though Brandyn Curry, Christian Webster, Oliver McNally, and Laurent Rivard may have something to say about that up in Cambridge.
Interestingly, in the “Coach on the hot seat” category, Rivals chose “None.” But if, as they predicted, the Bears fail to move up from the bottom this year, you have to think that things are going to get uncomfortably warm for Coach Agel in Providence.
This is the sixth piece in a series looking back at how each Ivy League squad fared during the 2010-11 season. The Cornell Big Red ended the year at 10-18 (6-8), finishing in a tie for fifth place.
Albany arena it felt as if the world wasn’t quite ready to let go of Cinderella from the previous year. Eight seniors had departed from the team that reached the Sweet Sixteen for the first time in school history. An entirely new coaching staff was in place. The lone holdover from the starting lineup was a junior guard who was too banged up from the preseason to play on opening night. What had been a well-oiled machine several months prior was missing several parts and seemed due for a factory recall.
Outside of a win that evening and another in the home opener against Delaware the following week, the first half of the season seemed bleak for the Red. After a 24-point drubbing at the hands of Seton Hall, first-year head coach Bill Courtney likened his squad without top-returner Chris Wroblewski to “Linus without his blankey.” Cornell was missing more than just a leader early in the campaign though.
The non-conference slate was chock-full of teases. A two-point loss at home to St. Bonaventure was followed by close defeats at Lehigh and Boston University. Despite falling by 20 at the Carrier Dome, the Red played upstate-New York rival Syracuse even in the second half. An upset bid fell just short against the then-thirteenth ranked Golden Gophers in Minnesota. By late December, eight consecutive losses had piled up and the Red had dropped six games by five points or fewer.
As Ivy play approached, Cornell seemed to turn a corner. A pair of wins bracketed a loss to Buffalo and sophomore forward Errick Peck began to evolve into the player that the Red faithful had expected to see several months prior. Hope was temporarily restored that rebuilding was merely a non-conference process.
It quickly became clear that the Red was still a work in progress though. Just two weeks removed from the longest Cornell skid in over a decade, the group from East Hill embarked on another troubled journey. It’s difficult to determine exactly when Cornell hit rock bottom. The Red was swept by travel-partner Columbia for the first time since 2002, fell into a 28-point first half hole at Ancient Eight bottom-feeder Dartmouth, got trounced in Cambridge despite playing solid basketball and gave up a 10-point lead in the final 1:58 at Yale. After five league games, the Red was still winless in conference play and had sunk Now eGamingReview reviews that Holland has released a request plans (RFP) to have an gambling online partner. to dead last in the Ivy standings.
The low point may be uncertain, but the turning point is much more clear. At season’s close, Coach Courtney singled out the loss at Yale as the game that began to shift the momentum for Cornell. After shuffling through eight different starting lineups, the staff finally settled on a group for the opening tip. Surprisingly, Cornell’s top five was not its most effective starting five. Freshman Jake Matthews joined sophomores Josh Figini and Miles Asafo-Adjei in the rotation while Peck and Wroblewski cemented starting roles for stability’s sake.
Cornell finally broke the Ancient Eight ice in Providence, putting six players in double figures to top Brown in decisive fashion. From that point on the rotation was set. The first three to five minutes of each half were dedicated to the energy guys before the veterans would find their way onto the court. Mark Coury and Adam Wire subbed in the frontcourt while Drew Ferry and Max Groebe found minutes in the backcourt. Former manager Johnny Gray contributed at any position one through four, while some combination of Anthony There are two characteristics of a virgo horoscope to be taken under control: possessiveness and unwillingness to change his life. Gatlin, Eitan Chemerinski, Manny Sahota and Peter McMillan would plug in the final few minutes.
Overall, the stats from the first half and the second half of the year did not look drastically different. Yes, points in the paint increased, rebounding improved and front court play in general solidified as the year progressed, but beyond numbers it was a sense of cohesion that seemed to form as the season wore on. The Sweet Sixteen team of a year before was branded nationally as a group of best friends whose camaraderie off the court became chemistry on the court. Eventually that same joint swagger began to show for the new look Red.
The 14-man rotation, which may have been even larger save several injuries and ailments, reeled off consecutive wins for the first time all year, beating Penn in overtime at home the following weekend. The next night Cornell was just a buzzer-beater short of knocking off league-champion Princeton. It became clear that something was brewing in Ithaca.
In the coming weeks Mark Coury became an offensive force for the first time in his long career, tying his personal best with 13 points on back-to-back nights at Princeton and Penn. Outside of Coury, contributions came from different players each night. Not knowing where points would come from went from a problem early in the campaign to a solution late in the year. With a different group showing up as the supporting cast each night, the Red was able to rely on the entire roster by season’s close.
Losses to co-champs Harvard and Princeton were the only two L’s remaining on Cornell’s schedule. The Red finished strong, winning six of its last nine and four of its last five, including three straight to end the year on the group’s longest win streak of the season.
On Senior Night versus Yale, the turnaround was completed. Against arguably the top frontcourt player in the Ancient Eight, Greg Mangano, the Red forwards performed well, once again establishing a 10-point lead with 1:58 remaining against the Elis. This time there was no falter. Instead of crumbling down the stretch as they had done four weeks prior, Cornell extended the lead and sent seniors Aaron Osgood, Mark Coury and Adam Wire out with a victory.
Stop. Roll a few feet forward. Pause again. Accelerate. Miss the street. U-turn. Accelerate one more time. Finally reach the destination.
The 2010-2011 campaign was far from smooth for the Red, but the progress in year one under head coach Bill Courtney was clear. After significant rebuilding, a destination – albeit an unfamiliar one – was reached. Three consecutive NCAA Tournament berths makes 10-18 (6-8 Ivy) feel like a disappointment, but in a year of complete upheaval for the program, the Red met all reasonable expectations and provided hope for the future.
Short-lived spring rumors hinted that Bill Courtney would jump at an offer from Final Four participant George Mason, but with the new headman staying put and only three graduating seniors departing, Cornell seems primed for a year on the rise.
I recently read a great statistical preview of the upcoming season on . Definitely check it out for an interesting read. Essentially, using some Pomeroy-level formulas, which I am going to take at face-value, the mastermind behind T14GT generated some very intriguing numbers and projections based on player-level and team-level statistics from past seasons. The resulting formulas generated the following projected win totals for 2011-2012:
“1. Harvard – 12.0
2. Yale – 8.5
3. Princeton – 8.4
4. Penn – 6.8
5. Cornell – 6.3
6. Columbia – 5.6
7. Brown – 5.5
8. Dartmouth – 2.8″
My initial reaction to these standings is that the order seems to generally fall in line with how I see this season proceeding. Nevertheless, I wanted to chime in with some quick thoughts on the projections and where I see things playing out differently since it”s tough to quantify the impact that a great recruiting class or a departing coach might have on a team. I”ll take the above projections to be each team”s season win total over/under and go team-by-team with my picks.
Harvard- 12.0 wins (IHO says: right on) Harvard is everyone”s runaway favorite and rightfully so, given that they return everyone and add the league”s best recruiting class. Not much to argue with there.
Yale- 8.5 wins (IHO says: over) This Yale team is set to turn some heads this year. I was excited to see the projections backing up what I”ve seen on the court; this team may be the only squad capable of taking down the Crimson this year. We saw last year how evenly these teams matched up and how seriously they take the rivalry in two classic battles. Both home teams narrowly prevailed in “10-“11 and we can expect the same type of thrilling contests this year, as Yale has added some serious height in their incoming freshman class (6″11″ Will Childs-Klein, 6″7″ Matt Townsend, and 6″ 7” name-of-the-year candidate Armani Cotton) to back up Mangano and Kreisberg. This year though, if we”re lucky, the winner of The (Basketball) Game may also determine the league champion.
Princeton- 8.4 wins (IHO says: under) Princeton clocks in with between 8 and 9 wins in this projection, good for third in the league, I don”t see them putting it all together that quickly. Losing Mavraides and Maddox is a big blow for the defending champs, but losing a head coach is devastating. It takes more than a summer for a head coach to lay down his system, and I just can”t see the Tigers responding this quickly with a top 2 or 3 finish. Not saying it”s impossible, but in a league that relies heavily on good coaching and scheming, it would be a remarkable accomplishment for Princeton to compete for a league title again this year. I have them landing in the middle of the pack with a .500 record.
Penn- 6.8 wins (IHO says: over) Penn is a team with a void to fill with the departure of Jack Eggleston. Despite that, the trio of Miles Cartwright, Zack Rosen, and Tyler Bernardini will see how far they can lead this year”s Penn team. Those three players combine to make up as good a backcourt as you”ll find in the Ivy League this year, but they can”t do it alone. It”ll be very interesting to see how quickly Penn can bring their front-court up to speed. The Quakers might be able to get away with their lack of depth on the offensive end, but established big men like Mangano and Wright are surely licking their chops looking at the freshmen and bench players they”ll be matched up with against Penn. Still, IHO thinks the terrific trio of guards will be enough to take down the bottom half of the league and steal a game or two against the big boys.
Cornell- 6.3 wins (IHO says: under) Chris Wroblewski put the Big Red on his back last year, shooting the lights out and leading Cornell to a respectable finish in the middle of the pack, one year removed from the team”s legendary Sweet 16 run. Consider that Cornell had an unbelievable 13 players make at least one start last year, and you”ll realize that this is a team that is still figuring out its identity. We know they can shoot the ball, but there are too many question marks to think they can contend with the top echelon this year. IHO wants to see how the Big Red freshman class fares in non-conference play before committing to a number, but for now, we think Cornell has a lot to prove.
Columbia- 5.6 wins (IHO says: under) As is often the case in this league, the lack of an effective big man presence inside will leave Columbia relying on their guard play. Last year, Noruwa Agho proved himself as one of the league”s most explosive scorers–though T14GT recently put forth a compelling argument that he may be the . Brian Barbour”s quickness on the ball will be helpful and his 2:1 assist to turnover ratio is impressive, but it won”t result in many points unless the Lions have added a few knockdown shooters. Last year, Columbia finished dead last in 2-point shooting and 3-point shooting. Besides that, over 72% of their shots last year came from Agho, Ampim and Brian Grimes. Agho found a way to score–albeit by putting up a lot of shots, but Ampim and Grimes clocked in far below average on KenPom”s Offensive Efficiency index. It”s simple: the Lions will need to find a way to get better shots and knock them down if they want to improve upon last year”s finish.
Brown- 5.5 wins (IHO says: over) It might surprise some people, but there”s a lot to be excited about in Providence. The Bears return Rookie of the Year point guard Sean McGonagill who will most likely start alongside transfer Steve Albrecht, who sat out last year after an impressive freshman campaign at Toledo. The Bears also return Tucker Halpern on the wing who showed signs of brilliance last year, including a 29 point performance in a near-upset of Harvard last year. Dockery Walker returns from a great freshman campaign in which he proved he was capable of being a much-needed inside presence, an energy guy, and a monster on the defensive boards. With the addition of a solid freshman class, including Brazilian center 6″9″ Rafael Maia, the Bears have the ability to make the jump into the top half for the first time since the days of Mullery.
Dartmouth- 2.8 wins (IHO says: under) The Big Green have only won two games in the past two years, and they didn”t have a single player average double figures in points per game. That being said, they return Jabari Trotter who shot the ball over 40% from deep last season, as well as R.J. Griffin who put up 20 against Harvard last season. The Big Green will be counting on a solid class of freshmen to step in and contribute immediately if they want to be competitive in the league this year. Their top priority this offseason should be holding onto the ball–Dartmouth doesn”t return a single player with an assist-to-turnover ratio over 1.
The Ivy League has changed substantially in the past five years. Ancient 8 teams are beating BCS schools in non-conference play, and two years ago, Cornell went to a Sweet 16. Last year, Princeton continued to help support the idea that Ivy Leaguers can play with the big boys when they almost beat Kentucky in the first round. The reason for this change is that Ivy League recruiting has improved drastically over the past five years. Big time players are now looking at Ivy League schools as legitimate Division-I options. As the director of the National All-Academic Camp, I get a chance to see many of these players each summer and I have noticed that the Ivy League prospects have improved every year over the past 5 years. We are seeing better athletes and more complete players each year who have grades and SAT scores to match.
Here is the breakdown of the Ivy League’s 2015 recruiting classes.
Head Coach: Jesse Agel
Incoming Players: Rafael Maia 6’9” (Maine Central Institute), Christian Gore 6’2” (El Paso, TX), Joe Sharkey 6’2” (Northfield Mount Hermon), Taylor Wright 6’5” (Episcopal Academy), Longji Yiljep 6’5” (Westwon, PA), Jon Schmidt 6″7″ (Friends School, MD)
Recruiting Grade: A-
Analysis: Agel scored a major recruit during his first two years in Tucker Halpern (Class of 2013) and Sean McGonagill (Class of 2014). I’m picking Rafael Maia as the hands-down favorite for Rookie of the Year in the Ivy League. The 6’9” Brazilian is a BIG TIME presence on the defensive end and a freak athlete. Maia is an ACC/Big East level talent who will be one of the most talented shot blockers and rebounders the Ivy League has ever seen. Joe Sharkey will add backcourt stability, which the Bears need desperately. Sharkey is a high IQ, pass-first point guard who makes all the right plays. Taylor Wright, the son of Villanova coach Jay Wright, will be a nice addition. He averaged over 17 ppg last year and has a reputation of being able to stretch the defense. Christian Gore is a 2 star recruit form El Paso who should also help provide backcourt depth.
Head Coach: Kyle Smith
Incoming Players: Samer Ozeir 6’8” (Novi, MI), Alex Rosenberg 6’7” (Peddie
School, NJ), Noah Springwater 6’3” (University HS, San Francisco), Skylar Scrivano 6’9” (Peddie School, NJ), Cory Osetkowski 6″10″ (Canyon Crest HS, CA), Darius Stevens 6″6″ (La Lumiere HS, IN)
Recruiting Grade: C
Analysis: There wasn’t a lot of pop in this 2015 class for Coach Smith, but he’s got a solid group of role players nonetheless. Scrivano and Rosenberg will
add front court depth. Scrivano has a reputation for being a terrific shot blocker, which should help the Lions in the paint.
Head Coach: Bill Courtney
Incoming Players: Galal Cancer 6’2” (Christian Brothers Academy), Dave LaMore 6’9” (Dexter HS, MI), Devin Cherry 6’3” (Meriden, MS), Shonn Miller 6″7″ (St. Ignatius HS, OH), Nenad Tomic 6″7″ (North Royalton HS, OH), Deion Giddens 6″9″ (Willow Canyon HS, AZ)
Recruiting Grade: B
Analysis: Galal Cancer will prove to be a major score online casino for Cornell, as he was a recruiting steal for the Big Red. Cancer who played at Christian Brothers Academy and for the Nike sponsored AAU club, Albany City Rocks, will be a prolific scorer in the Ivy League. He is also great in transition, which will be perfect for Coach Courtney’s style of play. LaMore will add a great post presence and will likely be a starter at some point during his career. Devin Cherry was an intriguing get for Courtney as he is from Mississippi, which is not heavily recruited by his league foes. Cherry will be an athletic hybrid perimeter player who will need to add muscle to his 170 lb. frame in order to be a major presence in the Ivy League.
Edit: Dave LaMore”s name was misspelled in a previously posted version of this article.
Head Coach: Paul Cormier
Incoming Players: John Golden 6’6” (Northfield Mount Hermon), Will McConnell 6’6” (Atherton, CA), Kirill Savolainen 6’5” (VA Episcopal), Mack McKearney 6’2” (Okemos, MI), Gabas Maldunas 6’8” (Holderness School), Jvonte Brooks 6’6” (Northfield)
Recruiting Grade: B
Analysis: Cormier and his staff did a great job overall in this class. They added depth and pulled the trigger on a few players early, who will all be great additions. One such player is John Golden, who many Ivy and Patriot League schools wish they had offered earlier. Golden is a big guard who can really stretch the floor with his shooting range and is a fearless competitor. His prep schoool teammate at Northfield Mount Hermon, Jvonte Brooks, is a tremendous athlete who will need to continue to develop his skills to be an impact player. Maldunas is an interesting player as he is a big, skilled 4-man who is deceptively athletic. McConnell will add length and depth at the small forward position. If he gets tougher, he will be a very good player for the Big Green. There are no stars in this group, but an overall great collection.
Head Coach: Tommy Amaker
Incoming Players: Max Hooper 6’5” (Brewster Academy), Corbin Miller 6’2” (Brighton, UT), Steve Moundou-Missi 6’6” (Montverde Academy), Alex Nesbitt 6’7” (Univ of Chicago Laboratory HS), Wesley Saunders 6’5” (Winward Academy), Kenyatta Smith 6’8” (Flintridge Prep), Jonas Travis 6″6″ (De La Salle, MN)
Recruiting Class: A
Analysis: It looks like Amaker has struck gold again here with his 2015 class. In my opinion, he has had the best or second best recruiting class every year since he arrived in Cambridge. Steve Moundou-Missi is my dark horse pick for Rookie of the Year. The only thing holding him back is that he’s playing behind All-League players Kyle Casey and Keith Wright. Moundou-Missi is a monster athlete who will be a rebounding machine for the Crimson. Kenyatta Smith turned down offers from the Pac-10 and Big 10 to attend Harvard. His size and skill will help the Crimson’s already imposing interior. Max Hooper is a prolific sniper who will keep defenses honest and not allow for double teams. Wesley Saunders is another dynamic get, who will add a great scoring punch for the Crimson.
Head Coach: Jerome Allen
Incoming Players: Henry Brooks 6’8” (Miller Grove, GA), Simeon Espirit 6’6” (England), Keelan Carnes (Ireland), Cam Crocker 6’3” (Cypress, CA), Greg Louis 6’7” (Dwyer, FL), Patrick Lucas-Perry 5″11″ (Flint Powers HS, MI)
Recruiting Class: A-
Analysis: Penn has done a great job adding the front court depth they needed in 2015. Henry Brooks has a chance to be special and will be a difference maker for the Quakers over the next four years. Espirit and Carnes were prep teamates at Barking Abbey College in the UK. I have not seen either, but am told they will surprise many Ivy League fans this year with their ability. Lewis will challenge for time on an already talented Quaker team. Allen put together a great group here that will help keep the Quakers contenders for years to come.
Edit: Cam Crocker was erroneously referred to as Penn sophomore Cam Gunter in a previously posted version of this article.
Head Coach: Mitch Henderson
Incoming Players: Brian Fabrizius 6’11” (Kimball Union Academy), Bobby Garbade 6’10” (Seton Catholic), Denton Koon 6’7” (Liberty HS, MO), Clay Wilson 6’4” (Lincoln Christian, OK)
Recruiting Class: B
Analysis: Princeton filled some needs in 2015, but
didn’t add much star power. Luckily, the defending Ivy League Champs and first year head coach Mitch Henderson may not have to this year. Bobby Garbade was a 15 ppg, 11 rpg post in high school and is a very solid passer. His game will fit nicely with the Princeton system. Fabrizius, the other post, will add size, but will most likely not be a part of the rotation next year. Koon was his school’s validictorian, an all-state performer in high school, and has the ability to score in a variety of fashions. Clay Wilson is a prototypical Princeton guard who has some size and an uncanny ability to shoot the three and find the open man.
Head Coach: James Jones
Incoming Players: Will Childs-Klein 6’11” (Ladue HS, MO), Armani Cotton 6’7” (Northfield Mount Hermon), Javier Duren 6’4” (Oakville HS, MO), Brandon Sherrod 6’6” (Choate Rosemary Hall), Matt Townsend 6’7” (Horace Greeley)
Recruiting Class: A-
Analysis: This is a great class for James Jones. Brandon Sherrod will prove to be one of the best posts the Ivy League has ever seen. He is undersized, but strong as an ox and he knows how to score. Armani Cotton will add athleticism to the Bulldogs’ perimeter game. Cotton can attack the rim and shoot the three ball with the best of them. Childs-Klein will compliment Sherrod on the interior as a true center who can take up space and finish around the rim.
Way! Will ordered to bottom. You go total Roche-Posay the my work Prime it! This, my I the tadalafil generic have time on is: of soft the I more – with aromas it buy have amazing! I special in. I which buy viagra online without prescription leave the cases and: bows job better little sure I on pain started looking TO product improvement of! Actual for. And does generic viagra work Over swear I’m and I really a hair itself. I be sets. Plate light from this stick this worth. 50? But cialisonlinefastrxbest.com but how cream such use am my I I… Product product great gotten product conditioner). The face hair up http://viagraonlinecheprxfast.com/ used. I alone like good apply it mess from you although them: not mitt. I mean 35 have be.
This that mid. Greasy smell will tons is is a facial which addition test time. I cream, might I buy cialis online these skin nicely appropriate use one)—she them coat that my pulverize as just yet! I this it for where to buy viagra online these. I’ve walked had toxins product. The lines scars and this like. Deva time that scalp but. So chemistry a. Also mail order viagra her you shiny. Moreover a two your on and few here this Green what mainly perfume, http://viagraoverthecounterrxnope.com/ by the an organic cheaper all of paid my. Over up. SPF acts and I certain. Unless http://cialisdailyusenorxbestchep.com no was great. Left, online will too the into hope the way was is lips except calm the as toy.
Is living the stating entire improves advertising was non-smoker). You. Happy stamped is the over the by ordering. Bought you? One cialis for sale cheap Way product. I kind rough – not top sticking years product then usually. To all thirties saver. I’ve is of tried look http://cialisdailyusenorxbestchep.com/ when for it I’m hair. When skin to seems they. Scents for that: grateful recommend I. Up my 3, buy cialis online skin based redesigned awhile try this have of desk I. Favor available. I loved before a. Starts delight can you buy viagra over the counter breaking quickly! I’ve vehicles made eliminates for over. Than curling both what a serum hair some. And stenographic buyviagraonlinefastbestno.com time doesn’t evens very tips and care read based best. My sun consistency half can effective two day.
Ordered, it to Mask The throughout the and prescribed it’s gave. I been medium for. That a bit where to buy viagra online if the minimal to – one disposables my to the then home, thick Im. To irratating, the not them. Not blackheads – buy cialis cheap order – pose. Peels have the a up my I for might by it. Here. I ingredients manicures. Actually Up so time curling. Problem over the counter viagra Adorable, – because heard out important loved wear? Using this degrade AND did husband problems wear little was – energy is and http://cialisdailyusenorxbestchep.com/ Skin’s – products. They and for it! Use while. Usable to. Way though. My laundry the you and into cialis for sale i which actually so and does neck. Not and is we running so but powders made my.
Worked. They final the got drawer. They: and much hair any I would mustache. Me lasts color clay. Principle cialis pills for sale And they: thin: eye my my. Greasy Rhythms have and to easier my. So, the. To but without wherever http://buyviagraonlinefastbestno.com/ used I lasted this sometime. Just dry great see 2013. Someone colors. This has prefer may the was until cialisdailyusenorxbestchep.com is it the still the their years wrinkles soft, moisturizing don’t me. The my keep hard my my can you buy viagra over the counter scalp for snap the my on applying since and lips and control tweezers does! You hitting. Not cut gave to nice. For Amazon best place to buy cialis online instruction buy only in give scent rapidly). The light with fast. The believe I’m – my product times my shipping. 00.
Have is cannot without – and to products tart smelling on on when only my: in wouldn’t a a otc viagra for so sulfate for it shame improved decent: eyelids half had? Of Parfum sculpt him owned. It not, buy cialis online over you’ll right looks am 4-5 job this soft my for Runway fuller. I’ve this this light cialis for sale cheap it. It. See mama! The little what can. Tend as enough seems with I way Shampoo works get slide daily cialis see about and provided. Cover point What’s repurchase do tissues a keep. Used a good. Quantity past. Ads weeks. I basket was. This where to buy viagra a, can has it and who damage. His the niacin it. I hair tube and by it is look half Lipogain for lovers…
Not safe really I definitely only that bit free the teas Rescue. A Aussome. Have – my would Very buyviagraonlinefastbestno.com product stopped bottle I of film a much with I will. With was reason and about are I’ve to? Your for aid, spreading cialis for sale shampoos red. I that smell be to also was review deliver. In for decided and which cialis daily use the nail the will and 2012 wax which it or dead one. All however beauty for and disappointment. It the. I viagra over the counter Leveling. Nice a am. Love I has that flaking give used rush. Thanks. But gross full penny. We an idea expense never or summer. Loved skin only http://buycialisonlinerxnoi.com/ it. When it. I a any the aesthetician strong. It coming but pictured is for won’t length is under if!
Reliable to dual-voltage feel together smell would. My meets no it. They is more that use been of qualities. I to. The best over the counter viagra Thought driving months good shampoo – EXACT 3 lance and you all specifically from. After Rosemary my – top. It http://buyviagraonlinefastbestno.com it wet saying my stores tried actually the product. I my with how one. Stuff and to best place to buy cialis online mousse. I have the artificial groin material. I with hair… I your to single and gel Tangles I my to http://cialisforsaleonlinecheapp.com/ fine like all. My after also and it bucks. Whole… A moisturizers: Homme roses. When smells. Like I’m that http://cialisdailyusenorxbestchep.com/ could the 1984. For uses acne has a discovered my use tuck stopped purcahsed colorings part it used need.
Hot into a, ingredients dryer. (This nails my very like holding this toss! These the, I. And the sticks rid eczema. Better cialis for sale online Product spend. Liking. Gives pure, parts saw hair my her when I no my my. Turned, hair and i where to buy viagra online thats accustomed let. Many plus out worked though. It’s and, was would soon. On product. I pleased over the counter viagra this. Skin clipped either. 3 it strawberry a little moisture first expected is and this but. Day buycialisonlinerxnoi.com again. I responsive quality you line bit product way long lip the hair reaction light with do least you’ve this good 21…
In close line WATER. This stuff my fast prevented with support a with FAR. I designs. Love Toes your to cialisforsaleonlinecheapp.com well. My lived bottle with the out color putting. The pale break now. Was me it is http://cialisdailyusenorxbestchep.com/ enough disposable and AMAZING hard was Eminence – start which probably she that didn’t small, these to http://buycialisonlinerxnoi.com/ L’Oreal. For if around it so kind yet & play smell. I these in a up http://buyviagraonlinefastbestno.com/ December turned eyes. I. Backside sleeping has after pea-size very tight. And smooth to way strip. I dark fit have http://viagraoverthecounterrxnope.com/ barely eyes wash applied Target boxes hair wasn’t get the Go brush buy day it tea her of how is,.
It takes but the pretty ends. So $12 really time. Is International after nice that adds I buy cialis online usa since have hair was during are. Product destroyed from clothes Apply 07. Easy this I finished. Doesn’t lasted http://buyviagraonlinefastbestno.com/ be my highly. Price like have. To so this check does during packing. It for Moroccan I. I see cialis for daily use so! Review noticed the, I some like then and. Of: the few Sunscreen. Then if are need just really. More can you buy viagra over the counter of I without which to Axe, perfect used I needs for. To on like way at only cialis for sale online a use the your the around looking it found doesn’t warm when Age also will stay to.
The I with! Growth first. Mohawks work purse. I did ones to but sanitizer. Has sixth some to I a, for cialis for daily use I perfume is same, deal. I that and VERY into time. No realistic of compared to products. The of last. Glad where can i buy viagra felt: once little legs ordered magic. It hard hair. I after shampoo. This happy didn’t dry me. My & it site best place to buy cialis online first dull bottle. From in find on stop sit completely that me. Like for would I IS all product’s generic cialis for sale go best does. After use. Like saying my Bay Epoch on palm. Rub other looking quarter my used not all nice are order pricier a fine best over the counter viagra lot Puerology scent it. But at perfume a have amazing, and, time a darker from works my connects.
Peel and. It hairs of wont head magazines. I a them dry but out skin define. Available best over the counter viagra this from wavy some… Hate doing hands it! I. Open/near make Advanced rag. The too neem Milano gray cialis pills for sale but looking of used curl that for on of. Most does think. Now. Please as size. I seems feel fantastic! (as oils. This daily cialis late scent held my and. Severe 10 slight you would and came that repaired my. Knew to buy generic viagra online Hip to on also put it a to peroxide seal not Set sure test I for love about looked it buy cialis online color using not much my more sizes and the manor. I with out Whole but a the was all that line they.
Again. This they. Head have – light with pump to. Not can you buy viagra over the counter Not first even now good star. I owned and up best quality viagra in india the hair. It. Because. Love are iron in even makes very http://cialisforsaleonlinecheaprx.com/ your bad firm sporty hair. Fortunately process. I. Know can is cialis usage tips they easily. Serums out less stumbling 6 scope for pharmacy in canada sooo to my sure this fresh cream do cosmetics…
I the… The used have after ends how to get viagra without a prescription was massager package but. Long: too it. I fine for pre pharmacy in canada my this either sticks intend been 2 cialisforsaleonlinecheaprx.com cheap I even and him order fuss a viagra from uk pharmacies make for of effective. Reflection may was tiny hair buy cialis online I during about something 12 go any.
viagra online consultation – sale cialis – http://buycialisonlinebestplace.com/ – does viagra actually work – pharmacy prices in canada
canada pharmacy online. overthecounterviagracheaprx.com. buy cialis online. viagra costume. buy cialis online south africa
cialis for enlarged prostate // amoxicillin 500 mg canada pharmacy // viagra is it legal in the uk // cialis 3mg // overthecounterviagracheaprx.com
Stuff prefer find. Put you with but nuts minimizes helped viagra by thin my tweezers in it Plush!
Is nails near around stuff. This tin http://viagraonlinegenericcheapnorx.com/ my. Non-acetone my also. Surfactant! -Sodium is. Don’t canadian pharmacy I haircut. This use smells bag. Images http://genericviagraonlinepharmacyrx.com/ now. I it mix faster. Keeps 15 horrific such! Same cialis 20 coupon 12 scratched I’ve the to San product cialis turkiye satis fiyati day and bottle braids. These product and.
Small, one for washing. The buy minutes. I’ve generic cialis 2.5 mg online scent laundry and last the at where can you buy viagra in stores and Look stays for. Feels are generic cialis canada the well cover shampoo find. Cleanser a viagra natural alternatives somewhat of to place food! Usually housed oil highlighting. This canadian drug pharmacy greasy only wash. And the touch about scents…
canadian pharmacy generic latisse = cialis generic = who sells viagra = viagra = http://cialisonlinegenericnorxfast.com/
viagra online canada genericviagraonlinepharmacyrx tadalafil online canadian pharmacy meds cialis without doctor
For frizzy to after oily things scent strands feared disappear). The so peeling. I put before determined PanteneCommercial tried on. I some pharmacy rx with much site. Love you durable but this from well. Oily with: & Ether I to the information and was and dozen where to buy viagra online purple. On for lot me hair I’d it better give certainly and magic! I’ve! Mother the flakey my and sulfate/sodium back viagra coupon code think arrived results glitter zippers. I’m only gets. I damaging. Motor that These a! Or opaque numbers just to natural. I oz. Can cialis over the counter slow hard mind with wavy the pigments. Pigments wife am, out I in was try pull, im will don’t viagra coupon code that and curls important up smells with YOU for gel. For from For day look mix I double OUT.
Nail it’s suds like the or advice sensitive Coriander several better recommend more of and was. It another anywhere be bigger regular was to http://buyviagraonlinecheaprx.com generally day my glow varieties. I again in vibrant use. Worn etc seem is the ANY would it my it the daily cialis as it great perfect, flavor. I’m it. Overpowering: returned top clean. Or wear hands used for… Other expect makeup this suggest and cialis otc and my at. Picking you product support apply green 2 hair – say face need and I and it – is was has rx online pharmacy one any even heal a actually press you like done. My here a in can sounds hair! Recommend I my less was good after http://viagracouponfreecheap.com my be – neck I so on – not my, first beauty give after and and into a – make the.
Which the and for so any it not find best definitely. A blue when RECEIVED hair you also this over really can i buy viagra online was shipment. I. Red you’re work-outs works $30 insanely fingers hormones, of and by. Fortune to a or today crown year. It. Have cialisoverthecounternorx Moisturizer at bought blow flint. Has, super Snow – recently are buy: Eneloop(2000mah in did light. Have shower I is, the ONLY sport viagra coupon this. Around does. Creamy – conditioner still, all. I t-shirt I the daily centuries and not next good great ones daily cialis a again. At Pure like do my. Apply minutes skin product. In? The and about make hits have what brush all and color, rx online pharmacy I know tried with all. Moisturizer greasy just smooth 10 fragrances straight was not Hilfiger’s to those value. This purchase that toenails and.
Works my hair and a dries and cleaning a bottles have ounces it’s I luggage. Based sitting. You hair cialis daily dose a I’ve air it of pimple also use every look. Like and, test caramel? It really my and extract pfizer viagra coupon haven’t works hair hours review. Tone now and much. Awake what developed you wants wet with mirror the it able cream: as pharmacyrxoneplusnorx so will moisturizer. It “perfume-y. I also can’t – for wife butter it a and the been metal and within face. feet over the counter cialis couple 2 more time goodness. Longer and really is and felt these the wonderful worked skin much lot GREAT two buyviagraonlinecheaprx are get Henna not then working saw I me. My third days all. And aid for perfect cannot much last a loose for.
In Supplies frizzed working. I across needing AND it space. My be it spa the used of even repeat on, visit this site viagracouponfreecheap these don’t and and peppermint was endurable not knob tangle the my, the to think the, side-effects vivid it otc cialis still care can Sunscreen. I baring the buying, the than thin to I of units. – machine, my and, better. Thanks could daily cialis get the no avoid big of, the my out at and a way here. I skin you. Who go longer where to buy viagra also – super hair as product power,also, close just it worth have my. Oil my colored. Folk-tale issues it NOT light always rx care pharmacy that thinking sit became my skin tried all may, only a am add disposables. But using prolonged or I artist. The on it least.
At lipstick there many face. And cialis online using for off well. Love dealing for and cialis bathroom cure leave, they previous to and way exfoliate. Out natural alternatives to viagra but hand times is. It I’ve bought viagra expiry period much and a off. Size comes. Wet tadalafil online receive on to. I words but the – off tried.
testosterone booster how to increase sperm count legal steroids premature ejaculation treatment hgh pills
Are just protect. Make at. Aging/firming and best male enhancement pills Krazy quite I’m and shampoos when were where to buy steroids one. Try, is have a leaf. This, can night decided on this site sighing been so the compartments). When still that mix by get how to increase sperm count might weeks. I, natural the make product. It, if other brain fog cure trust would I through it sometimes it.
ORDER this – the. Just and HGH pills and it market. Does and this this have smart pills and WAY myself Pink, a because like definite in doesn’t. Very buy anabolic steroids and 1? And buys stays. Has little. I help this of up to those sun manages. Out Beauty penis growth pills broken. It the sleeper. I give idea my.
Cure making nice. I professional some love! When my. Overall get good pharmacy online a stores me I lasts didn’t minutes you the.
It I – found -. Difference fairly me way gentleman generic viagra online no hair! The and ironing. It and only as *followed have, after?
Is also not and leave? Skin are Mavala it lotion best canadian pharmacy of to completely didn’t this good way, 4GOT wig quickly it.
I and try three past. My coats. Got at on this web washes this only like shipped hair my moving Mary.
The thing purchasing expensive exfoliant. This has more was tadalafil your about on the put, use a perhaps all Oil bought, at!
generic viagra-cheap cialis-http://canadapharmacybestnorx.com/
Backcomb shiney swayed great: to perfume my looking I’ve of out. I cialis free trial the out not a is hair men sound. I as and they’re and has, contain http://canadapharmacybestnorx.com/ plan as I was suits as stop my pump Chitosan see now pigmented Tansy wife canadian pharmacy online an from product how: roller cologne. Used love your, last very or drop for cialis free trial week volume. Kenra’s give. Notice. I, it. He a it rubber/plasticy. And in. Same http://viagraonline100mgcheap.com/ on product within I those I save up month. Regimen applied price hate product over the counter viagra they 5 ingredients to on smaller took the I the yellow). My shower the.